BABA vs. AMZN: Which Mega-Cap Cloud Stock Has More Upside? Wall Street’s Take

Wall Street’s analyst consensus currently implies more percentage upside for Alibaba (BABA) than for Amazon (AMZN) over the next 12 months — but that extra upside comes with noticeably higher geopolitically driven risk. Analysts’ average price targets place Alibaba roughly in the ~$150 range (about +24% from recent levels), while Amazon’s consensus sits near $262–263 (about +13–14% upside).

Why the headline gap exists

Two forces drive the difference in implied upside: valuation and risk profile. Alibaba trades materially cheaper on forward multiples than Amazon, which makes it easier for analysts to project larger percentage gains if positive catalysts arrive. Conversely, Amazon’s multiple already bakes in a lot of AWS’s predictable cash generation, so analysts assign a smaller—but more conservative—upside.

Cloud growth — the core business case

AWS remains the market leader and a cash engine for Amazon: in the most recent quarter AWS generated $30.9 billion of sales, up 17.5% year-over-year, and it continues to supply the bulk of Amazon’s operating income. That scale and profitability explain why many analysts view AMZN as a steadier cloud exposure.

Alibaba Cloud (Aliyun) is smaller than AWS but has been growing and repositioning toward higher-margin AI workloads. Recent company reporting and sector coverage show Alibaba Cloud expanding revenues and improving profitability metrics, though its absolute scale remains far below AWS. Analysts who are constructive on BABA argue the market hasn’t fully priced the cloud/AI upside.

Valuation and the “rerating” story

Analysts who prefer Alibaba point to a cheaper starting multiple: a successful re-acceleration in China’s consumer spending or a clearer path to monetizing AI work for Aliyun could trigger a multiple expansion and drive outsized percentage gains. By contrast, Amazon’s more mature AWS is already reflected in a higher multiple, limiting percent upside absent a major multiple rerating.

Key risks investors should weigh

• Alibaba-specific risks: Regulatory and policy uncertainty in China (antitrust probes and changed regulatory frameworks over recent years) and macro sensitivity in the Chinese consumer market remain meaningful downside drivers. Past regulatory interventions and ongoing policy scrutiny mean the stock is more politically exposed than a U.S.-based cloud leader.

• Amazon-specific risks: Amazon faces heavy capital spending (including data center buildouts and Project Kuiper satellite investments) which can pressure near-term margins and cash flow. Project Kuiper and elevated capex forecasts are a common analyst caveat to upside in AMZN.

  
  
  
  

The Analyst's Dilemma: Growth vs. Stability

The consensus among Wall Street analysts is that the choice between Alibaba and Amazon hinges on an investor's risk appetite.

The Bull Case for Alibaba: Proponents of Alibaba point to its deeply undervalued stock, its strong foothold in the massive Chinese market, and the significant growth potential of its cloud and AI initiatives. Analysts believe that as the company navigates a complex regulatory environment and focuses on its core businesses, there is substantial room for share price appreciation to catch up with its intrinsic value.

The Bull Case for Amazon: For those with a more conservative investment approach, Amazon is the clear favorite. Its diversified business model, spanning e-commerce, advertising, and the highly profitable AWS, offers a level of stability that Alibaba, with its concentrated exposure to the Chinese economy and regulatory landscape, cannot match. Analysts emphasize Amazon's proven track record of execution and its leadership position in key global technology trends.

What the Wall Street math implies for investors

• If you want larger percentage upside and can stomach volatility and China/regulatory risk: Analysts’ consensus suggests Alibaba is the higher-beta, higher-reward pick. The cheaper valuation plus potential cloud/AI rerating is the primary bullish thesis.

• If you prefer steadier, de-risked cloud exposure with strong cash generation: Amazon is the safer play in analysts’ eyes. AWS’s size, margin profile, and consistent operating contribution make AMZN the lower-volatility cloud compounder — albeit with a narrower immediate upside band priced in by the Street.

Investor takeaways — practical next steps

1. Treat analyst price targets as one input: combine them with your view on China policy, consumer demand, and AI adoption curves.

2. If you own BABA or are considering adding exposure, size positions to reflect the higher event risk (regulatory or macro shocks can move the stock fast).

3. For core cloud allocation where you prioritize cash generation and stability, Amazon is the “sleep-well” choice even if the headline upside is smaller.

4. Consider a balanced approach: a core position in AMZN for stability plus a smaller, opportunistic position in BABA for asymmetric upside if you have a higher risk tolerance.

   
   
   
   

To view the latest ratings & price targets on Amazon click here